The idea of generations, especially as Demographers use them, is overrated. I’ve said so before, I’ll likely go on saying it.
Being born at the same time as others gives you a set of shared cultural memories and not much else. Now, those shared cultural memories can be powerful, especially given the rate of pop culture decay, but they aren’t as determinative as people like to believe.
I have some more to say on this topic, over on Contena.com, which is a writer’s resource that’s added a blogging feature. I like to try out blogging features, so I penned Dead X.
The idea of “Generation X” was coined by the Canadian writer Douglas Coupland, and he was referring to people born around his time, the late fifties to early sixties, who came of age in the seventies. Too young to really be involved in the great Sixties upheaval, they lived in the immediate consequences of it. We would call these folk today “Late Boomers”.
Now, this is a provocative idea, if we were to apply the 15-year cycle that Democraphers are fond of using today. What if, instead of this:
- Baby Boom: 1946-1964
- Generation X: 1965-1980
- Millenials: 1981-1995
- Generation Z: 1996-2010
- Generation Alpha: 2011-2025
We borrowed from Coupland’s original notion, and went with this:
- Baby Boom: 1946-1960
- Generation X: 1961-1975
- Generation Y/Xennials: 1976-1990
- Generation Z/Millenials: 1991-2005
- Generation Alpha: 2006-2020
This setup has the virtue of a) recognizing that postwar birthrates started to decline in the early 60’s, when birth control became a reality, b) using the original conception of Generation X, c) moving the group called “Millenials” to those born around the actual Millenium, and d) giving the “Xennial” identity an actual demography.
Of course, it would shift myself from Generation X to Generation Y, but it would put me in the same Generation as my wife, so… I can live with it.