A Viable Health-Care Reform Strategy

Keith Hennessy of the Hoover Institution has the skinny.

Basically, we can repeal by reconciliation, but first we have to pass a damn budget. And then:

Future Republican majorities can work with moderate Democrats to enact needed insurance market reforms and the bipartisan Wyden-Ryan Medicare reform plan, which provides a stronger system of competing private health plans as opposed to government-run “fee-for-service” Medicare.

And then:

Reform should start by replacing the tax exclusion for employer-provided health insurance with a flat tax deduction or credit. This should be combined with insurance reforms that allow consumers to buy portable health insurance sold anywhere in the nation, through their employer or on their own. That means you’ll be able to take your health insurance with you from one job to the next. Tax policy will no longer push Americans toward lower wages in favor of more expensive health insurance.

Top it all off with expanded contribution limits for health savings accounts, aggressive national medical liability reform, and structural Medicare and Medicaid reforms that dramatically slow the growth of government and deficits.

That all sounds good, even if it’s short on details. But we’d need to know if we can actually find these “moderate Democrats” who will be willing to do business with us. Are there enough who believe enough in market-based reforms? Can a Democrat even say “market-based reform” without being pilloried?

Sure they can. We just have to make sure they know we want one. I think seeing Romney sworn in as the 45th President, Boehner retained as Speaker, and McConnell sworn in as Majority Leader with 55 or so GOP Senators smiling on will have a salutary effect on their considerations of rhetorical possibility.

2 thoughts on “A Viable Health-Care Reform Strategy

  • And, instead of their idiotic mandate, merely *encourage* the purchase of health insurance by virtue of a tax deduction/credit.

    Of course, the anti-wealthy occu-nut supporters in DC would try and pass that off as being “for the rich” when , like the Bush 43 tax cuts, they benefit everybody.

    • Well, if it’s not made better by the government, how will all those well-meaning do-gooders take credit? Think of the sleep they’ll miss.


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s