If you stretch the meaning of “unconstitutional” past the point of all usefulness, sure.

I should like this argument more than I actually do. It’s originalist at root, and the guy has damning quotes from Hamilton and Madison about the evils of super-majorities. In terms of reforming or ending the filibuster, he makes a solid case.

In terms of having the Supremes declare it “unconstitutional,” he’s much weaker, because arguing that anyone’s “rights” are being violated by the filibuster is going to be a tougher sell. It relies upon the wearisome mission-creep of the “one man, one vote” rule.

The Senate created this mess. The Senate should fix it.

Feed My Ego and Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s